Role of the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education and ...
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs Diana Stammers, Head of Quality December 2014 Coming up UK quality assurance framework Quality Assurance Agency for HE (QAA) HE Review of OU, December 2015 UK Quality Code for HE Academic quality and standards what do we mean?
Academic standards: the level of achievement that a student has to reach to gain an academic award (skills and knowledge base expected of students for a particular subject area at a particular level). Academic quality describes how well the opportunities provided for students help them to achieve their award; making sure that appropriate and effective learning/programme design, teaching, supervision, other support, assessment and resources are provided. (Also known as quality of learning opportunities; quality of student learning experience etc.) Quality and The Open University The OU operates within same UK frameworks for quality and academic standards as other HE institutions
awarding degrees Academic standards and attainment by students must be equivalent to that of whole higher education sector Quality management audited by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education - external peer review, used for all universities The OU is accredited by the US Middle States Commission on HE accreditation reapproved in 2010 QAA HE Review what is it? QAAs principle review method for universities and colleges Aim is to inform students and the wider public if a provider
meets UK Expectations for: 1. setting and maintenance of academic standards 2. provision of learning opportunities 3. provision of information 4. enhancement of the quality of learning opportunities providing accountability + encouraging improvement 5 Scope All provision leading to OU qualifications or credit at FHEQ levels 4 to 8 (+ Scottish equivalent) Taught provision and research degrees
Direct provision and provision delivered with third party 6 Key elements 1. Peer review 2. Involvement of students (reviewer, lead rep, meetings) 3. Management of standards, quality, information, enhancement 4. Evidence-based self-evaluation document supported by documentary evidence 5. Built entirely around the UK Quality Code for HE 6. Reference to (benchmarked) data
7. Core and theme 7 Outcome 7 March 2016 QAA publish Report 9 May 2016 OU publishes action plan on its public website
Report, includes: Judgements Features of good practice Affirmations of current action Recommendations for action -with deadlines Commentary on a selected theme 8 Outcome Four judgements on: 1. setting and maintenance of academic standards meets / does not meet UK Expectations 2. quality of learning opportunities
3. information about learning opportunities 4. enhancement of students learning opportunities commended meets requires improvement to meet does not meet UK Expectations Can be differentiated judgements for different provision 9 Review Visit 9 Nov 2015 OU finds out duration; lines of enquiry;
who team wishes to meet, including partners; visit timetable; further document requests (incl audit trails) 7 Dec 2015 Review visit meetings start Staff (including VC; ALs) Staff from partner links Students: OUSA reps; other students incl students at partners; possibly alumni Possibly external examiners, employers Team interrogate documentation further - triangulation Final day reach judgements team spend with QAA Review Manager
10 QAA HE Review of OU, December 2015 ARC involvement Self-evaluation document (February-May 2015) Student mini-submission? Possible visit meetings senior staff, supervisors, students; video or tele-conference 9 Nov 15 Find out who team wants to meet 7 Dec 15 Week of review visit
Letter to be sent shortly UK Quality Code for HE Published by QAA First section October 2011; last sections October 2013 Phased in for QAA reviews; all in use from August 2014 Three parts: academic standards; academic quality; published information
Expectation per chapter; indicators of sound practice; explanatory text QAA UK Quality Code for HE Part A: Setting and maintaining academic standard s Covers: A1: UK and European reference points for academic standards A2: Degree-awarding bodies' reference points for academic standards A3: Securing academic standards and an outcomesbased approach to academic awards
QAA UK Quality Code for HE Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality B1: Programme design, development and approval B2: Recruitment, selection and admission to HE B3: Learning and teaching B4: Enabling student development and achievement B5: Student engagement B6: Assessment of students and recognition of prior learning B7: External examining B8: Programme monitoring and review B9: Academic appeals and complaints B10: Managing higher education provision with others B11: Research degrees
QAA UK Quality Code for HE Part C: Information about higher education provision Information about the higher education provider Information for prospective students Information for current students Information for students on completion of their studies Information for assuring quality and standards B10 Managing HE with others Responsibility for academic standards of awards cannot be delegated by the degree awarding organisation - OU needs to ensure equivalent
academic standards (covered in Quality Code Part A) Overall responsibility for academic quality with the degree awarding organisation but delivery is shared - OU to ensure equivalence of opportunities Processes for assuring quality and academic standards, at least as rigorous as for direct provision, e.g.: Approval, monitoring & review (partnership; programmes; information) Use of management information, student feedback External examiners and other external input Due diligence (regular), written agreements Risk-based approach B11 Research Degrees
Environment for success, quality of support Consistency while recognising diversity amongst students
Clear and available regulations, codes of practice, procedures Robust, fair and transparent selection Clear entitlements and responsibilities of students Supervisor skills, time, development and responsibilities Research, personal, professional skills development - aligned with Researcher Development Framework; reviewed regularly Robust progress monitoring, review, and assessment Evaluation and action MI, feedback, representation Records Communication and accessibility of information OU and ARC Quality Code mappings Evaluating alignment with Expectation and Indicators
Planning actions for improvement Refreshing mappings after action A reflective approach to quality: 6 quality questions What are you trying to do? PURPOSES Why are you doing it? REASON
How are you going to do it? METHOD Why is that the best way to do it? OPTIMISATION How do you know it works? How can you improve it? EFFECTIVENESS ENHANCEMENT
The Tonghak Rebellion in Korea, partly against Japanese influence begins. China sends troops in support of government. Japan sent over 200,000 troops to protect its 'zones of influence'. In reality, Japan was trying to cement its control of Korea and...
Day Rehabilitation & Day Treatment Intensive. Program standards & documentation. By dhcs and acbh. This morning's intentions are to: Review the program components that have been established by DHCS for DR/DTI programs which will set a context to discuss the...
Mr. Namm baked 252 cookies, Mrs. Clancy baked 105 cookies, and Mr. Palavas baked 168 cookies. Each baker packaged them with the same number of cookies in each package. What is the greatest number of cookies that could be in...
Ideal Ammeter: To have a minimum effect on the circuit being measured, the inserted ammeter must have zero resistance, so that there is zero potential difference across the ammeter. Electronic ammeters can give good approximations to this condition, but electro-mechanical...
Frequency Distributions Chapter 2 Distributions Four different ways to visually describe just one variable Frequency table Grouped frequency table Frequency histograms Frequency polygon Histogram for the Frequency Table of Graduate Advisors Histogram for the Grouped Frequency Table of TV Pacing...
The problem isn't in the definition of 'success', it is in the definition of 'failure'. If a project is 1 month late or 5% over budget, is that a failure or just disappointment? ... Fixed Price, T&M, Fixed Resources. Define...
Scrum training complete - all team members. Team to build on the automated abstract review process established in 2018. 2019 goal of standardizing work for Live Labs. Playbook for use with presentation teams. Lessons Learned/Orientation with 2020 team on Friday...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!