Insert title here

Insert title here

Defining Criterial Features at C1: an approach Susan Sheehan Acknowledgement This project was funded by the British Council through the Assessment Research Grant scheme. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter and do not represent those of the British Council.

Contents Project background

Methodology Results Conclusions Project Background First came the Blue Book Project Background

Then came Project background The project aimed to identify criterial features of written and spoken English at C1. The project hoped to bring clarity to our understanding of an under-specified and under-described level (Weir, 2005, Green, 2012).

Problematic nature of C1 C1 is a challenging CEFR level to investigate as there is a lack of consensus around what makes a person a C1 level language user (Weir, 2005b). When writing the Core Inventory the C levels were the most problematic. Indeed, the lack of consensus around what should be taught at C levels led to C2 being

excluded from the project. Limited consensus was found around C1 Problematic nature of C1 North (2014:50) states that: Level C1 is characterised by access to a broad range of language that results in fluent, spontaneous communication They (C1 speakers) are also very accurate, with a solid grasp of

the main grammatical structures of the language Problematic nature of C1 C1 is a level which is requested by various authorities. For example, for a teacher certification agency C1 is the required level for someone wishing to English as a foreign language

Use of Core Inventory The Core Inventorys authors argued that: The Core Inventory is a documentation of good practice. In future it will be interesting to compare the Inventory with data-based research conducted with learnersand note points of similarity and contrast. Fruitful avenues of research could be opened up to investigate possible explanations or reasons for the differences. (2010:18)

Definition of a criterial feature ...criterial features that might help users to distinguish one level from another. (Green, 2012:94) Methodology MA TESOL students with IELTS scores of 6.5 or above

were invited to take a test of written and spoken English. The test had been created to satisfy the requirements of an external validation agency. The scripts were analysed with ATLAS ti software to identify which of the features described as core in the Core Inventory are found in the scripts and with what level of frequency. The software was used on both the written and audio data

The participants The participants were all aspiring teachers of English. Participants came from China, Libya, Kurdistan, Vietnam and Pakistan. The first two countries in the list provided the most participants. The participants were all aged between 25 and 35. The majority of the participants were female. This reflects the gender balance of the course. All participants aspired to careers as English

teachers upon completion of their studies. Materials Participants were asked to complete a written test and an oral interview. Written test included multiple-choice grammar test, lexis test and an extended writing task Oral interview questions based on past language

learning experiences and reasons for being a teacher Data analysis The tests of grammar and lexis were marked using a key of correct answers. The extended writing task and interview data were analysed using ATLAS.ti software. The codes used were based on the Core Inventory. The codes were then

applied to data. So, for example, Critiquing and reviewing, 33 was used to code all examples of participants using such language. Data Analysis Following the practice established by the Core Inventory writers language points were considered to be criterial if they reached the appropriate level of frequency.

Results grammar test Generally participants responded correctly. Two test items were answered incorrectly by most of the participants. These were: 30 expressing certainty, probability doubt I rather doubt that hell come. 181 collocations The suspense is palpable.

Results lexis C1 words were correctly identified 55 times. This compares to 37 correctly identified words at B2 level and 16 words at C2. The highest average scores were found at C1 level with the exception of A1.

Results writing and interview Nearly one quarter of the language points included at C1 occurred with sufficient frequency to suggest that they could be considered criterial for the level. The language points which could be considered criterial tended to be those relating to argumentation and expressing feelings and attitudes precisely. There is some evidence to suggest that giving advice could be

considered to be criterial. Conclusions Perhaps the significance of the project lies in the creation of an approach to identifying criterial features by using the Core Inventory. This project may indicate that C1 level users share more in common than has previously been thought to be the

case. References Capel, A, 2012, Completing the English Vocabulary Profile: C1 and C2 Vocabulary, English Profile Journal vol 3 pp 1-14 Council of Europe, 2001, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Gad, L, Geranpayeh, A, Khalifa, H, and Buckendahl, C, Standard Setting to an International Reference Framework: Implications for Theory and Practice, International Journal of Testing, vol 13, pp 32-49 References Green, A, 2012, Language Functions Revisited Theoretical and empirical bases for language construct definition across

the ability range, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Jones, G, 2015, A Validation Study of the British Council EAQUALS Core Inventory for General English, British Council, London References North, B, Ortega, A and Sheehan, S, 2010, British Council EAQUALS Core Inventory for General English, British

Council, London North, B, 2014, The CEFR in Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Weir, C, 2005b, Limitations of the Common European Framework for developing comparable examinations and tests Language Testing, vol 22, pp 282-300

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Planeación Fiscal Estratégica

    Planeación Fiscal Estratégica

    La Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles la define como el contrato por el cual una persona concede a otras que le aportan bienes o servicios, una participación en las utilidades y en las pérdidas de una negociación mercantil o de...
  • Experimental Design and Graphical Analysis of Data

    Experimental Design and Graphical Analysis of Data

    Experimental Design and Graphical Analysis of Data Rex P. Rice-2000; edited M. Schober 2002; questions by K. LaFever, 2009 Independent & Dependent Variables When scientists set up experiments they often attempt to determine how a given variable (IV) affects another...
  • Grove Vale Primary Shool

    Grove Vale Primary Shool

    The completed EYFS Profile also includes a short commentary on each child's skills and abilities in relation to the three key characteristics of effective learning. This will support future curriculum planning and will provide the Year 1 teacher with important...
  • Logistics Association Campaign Plan 20172028 Phase I -

    Logistics Association Campaign Plan 20172028 Phase I -

    3.4 Foster ties with Support Service Community including former (RCASC, RCOC, RCAPC, RCPC) and current (RCEME, RCMS, RCDC, RCChS and Svc Bn) Associations. ... 2.2 CF Logistics Museum and affiliates supported.
  • Tree Identification - Home - Buckeye Valley

    Tree Identification - Home - Buckeye Valley

    Opposite Trees of Michigan Only four major native trees in Southern Michigan that are opposite MAD Horse Maples Ashes Dogwoods Horse Chestnut And two minor opposite species Ohio Buckeye Northern Catalpa Eye C or I see or BuckCat Maples and...
  • The Epic Hero - Ms. Woodcock's Page of Wonders

    The Epic Hero - Ms. Woodcock's Page of Wonders

    Odysseus, Hercules. Epic Hero. Epic Heroes. Hero, in the original Greek sense, means a demigod—the offspring of a god and a mortal. In a broader sense, a hero is one who stands out from the ordinary individuals as one who...
  • What is Intelligence? -

    What is Intelligence? -

    1) word order (SVO, SOV, VSO) will predict whether a) the adjective precedes or follows the noun, b) whether the language uses pre- or postpositions, or c) whether in nominal genitive constructions the owner precedes what is owned or vice...
  • Welcome 2018 Season Banquet I pledge allegiance to

    Welcome 2018 Season Banquet I pledge allegiance to

    The Jeannine Davis award acknowledges the contributions made by the league's women volunteers and was established in recognition of one of our most active mothers ever. It is presented each year to the woman who, by continuous service over a...