Good Management, IT and productivity

Good Management, IT and productivity

Economics and Business Exchange Supported by Deloitte. 1 Incentivising innovation ippr economics and business exchange 13 November 2005 Chiara Criscuolo Centre for Economic Performance, LSE 2 Why are we interested in innovation? Technological knowledge is a driver of productivity Not the only one driver: Organisational knowledge Skills Physical Capital, ICT Productivity isnt everything, but in the long run it is almost everything (Paul Krugman) Productivity growth drives growth of real wages

Productivity growth can be used to finance government expenditure 3 A simplified scheme Productivity Knowledg e R&D Modified Figure 1 Griliches and Pakes NBER WP561 1980 4 A simplified scheme Productivity Selfreported Innovatio n Knowled

ge Flows competition Basic Science Knowledge R&D Knowledge base Patent s Non-R&D Expenditur e In knowledge costs Skills

5 How does the UK measure up? UK Productivity Gap, 1990-2001, Market Sector (UK=100) 160 140 120 output per hour 1990 output per hour 1995 output per hour 2001 100 80 60 40 20 0 France

Germany Source: OMahony (2004) US 6 140 UK Productivity Gap, 1999 (UK=100) 120 100 output per hour (market sector) 80 60 TFP (capital and skills adjusted,

market sector) 40 20 0 France Germany US Source: OMahony and de Boer (2002) 7 INNOVATION OUTPUT: Patents Share of countries in triadic patent families 40 35 30 USA J apan

25 20 Germany 15 10 5 Franc e UK 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Source: OECD 8 Other innovation measures

Alternative innovation measures. Source: Community Innovation Survey, based on Oslo manual Only comparable information for some EU countries Source: IFS 9 UK R&D stagnant over medium run R&D to GDP 1991-2003,G7 Intensity of gross expenditure in R&D as a percentage of GDP 3.5 3.0 R&D intensity has stagnated since 1991 and fallen behind other countries Not just de-industrialization: within sector Japan USA Germany

2.5 France UK 2.0 Canada 1.5 1.0 Italy 0.5 1991 1992 1993 1994

1995 1996 Source: SET, 2005; 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1 Broader measures of investment in knowledge (as % of GDP 2002) R-D

Software Higher education % Sweden 1.7 1.2 1.3 United States Finland 1.0 Korea 1.8 Denmark 0.9

OECD Japan 1.2 Canada 0.1 Australia 0.3 Germany 0.5 Belgium 0.0 EU

0.5 Netherlands 0.3 France 0.3 United Kingdom Austria 0.2 1.2 Spain 0.7 New Zealand 0.0

Ireland -0.2 Italy Change in investment in knowledge to GDP ratio (1994-2002) Greece Portugal 0 2 4 6 0.3 0.8 0.5 8

1 A simplified scheme Productivity Selfreported Innovatio n Knowled ge Flows competition Basic Science Knowledge R&D Knowledge base Patent s

Non-R&D Expenditur e In knowledge costs Skills 1 Other innovation inputs: Knowledge Spillovers Hard to find cross-country evidence on knowledge spillovers Possible proxies: FDI/Presence of foreign affiliates Trade openness of the country Patent citations Mobility of workers Cooperation Between Businesses Between Businesses and the science base UK seems to do quite well on all of these proxies 1

Innovation Policies Correct for market failures (e.g. in financing R&D) R&D Tax credit system Loan guarantees Banking system/venture capital (?) Correct for externalities Knowledge Spillovers Role of foreign presence (embeddedness) Role of foreign sourcing (intra and extra firm) Absorptive capacity Make the country more conducive to innovation: Supporting basic scientific research commercialisation of inventions University-business links (Lambert) Increasing supply of skills Entry of new firm and growth of better firms Competition 1 R&D tax credits

Many other countries with R&D tax creditsactually UK system quite generous UK adopted in 2000, first for SMEs now for all firms Current cost about 430m p.a. Good econometric evidence that R&D does react to changes in its tax-price (Hall and Van Reenen, 2000) But why no pick-up (even a fall in 2004)? Slow response; takes about 10 years for most of effect to be felt still need to evaluate and do a proper cost benefit all R&D subsidies increases wages of (high income) R&D workers (Goolsbee, 1999) the UK R&D intensity gap: smaller proportion of firms doing R&D at all (firms that do are as R&D intensive as firms abroad) 1 Innovation support programs

Overcome credit constraint and high uncertainty (especially for SMEs) Loan guarantee SMART SPUR Increase knowledge flows and collaboration LINK and Collaborative R&D (between businesses and between businesses and research institutions) Knowledge Transfer Partnerships Faraday Partnerships and Knowledge Transfer networks MANY others: business link webpage : 2667 listings in the support directory for starting up and developing a business 1 Issues with Innovation Support schemes Policy evaluation widespread in education or labour market programs Existing evaluations of DTI schemes that support innovation is very scarce and is lumped together with other schemes (e.g. Regional Selective Assistance) Econometric Methodology and data linking allow evaluation of innovation support programs

1 Role of foreign presence/sourcing and global engagement Evidence that Multinationals and globally engaged firms are more innovative Both because they invest more in R&D They learn from their headquarters/other firms in the group (Criscuolo et al., 2005 and Brastetter, 2004) Role of International trade for learning Learning by importing (evidence MacGarvie, 2004) Learning by exporting (mixed evidence) Role of foreign affiliates as a source of knowledge spillovers Evidence shows that knowledge spillovers are along the value chain (vertical) Role of domestic multinational as a source of knowledge spillovers Reverse technology transfer/Technological sourcing (Griffith, Harrison, Van Reenen, 2004) 1

Role of foreign affiliates Knowledge spillovers Increase competition Issues: They come but they need to stay: reasons for location Lower costs Acces to skilled labour/science base Proximity to market How much knowledge spillovers do UK firms get from foreign affiliates (FA)? evidence that FA source more knowledge from abroad but not more likely to transfer technology to the local economy as compared to local firms (Cassiman and Veugelers, 2004) . How to increase Embeddedness? What is the role of UK multinationals? They are likely to be more embedded(interesting issue for research)

1 Role of foreign sourcing One important type of International technology transfer is technology sourcing hypothesis firms obtain international R&D spillovers by locating their inventors/ R&D labs close to leading edge research Question: Do UK firms with stronger inventor presence in the US benefit disproportionately from US R&D efforts? UK behind the US (frontier) but a lot of historical linkages Answer: Griffith, Harrison and Van Reenen find that UK firms benefit more from US R&D spillovers if they have strong US inventor presence Policy relevance: EU policy makers attempted to repatriate R&D labs away from US (Lisbon Agenda) More generally: is it nationality or location of R&D that matter? Is there a trade-off between the two? 2 Other issues: Role of basic science UK does well in elite science

**More papers per head and citations per head than main competitors Papers and citations per head (UK=100), average over 1998-2003 Source: Evidence Ltd. Thomson ISI (2004) 2 Why doesnt this translate in innovation? Do universities have the right incentives? E.g. evaluation and funding based on RAE performance Incentivising commercialisation of inventions by universities (Higher education innovation fund) : trade-off: knowledge is a public good Collaboration with businesses 2 Other issues: Role of competition, regulation and firm turnover Competition Important driver of innovation and productivity (e.g. Blundell, Griffith, Van Reneen, 1999, Bloom et al., 2004)

UK position seems strong on OECD Indicators Schumpeterian theory of creative destruction stresses the positive role of firms turnover and in particular of firm entry Cross-country evidence shows that UK has quite high turnover but that the rate of growth of high productivity firms is low 2 Policies to Raise Innovation and Productivity Innovation inputs (e.g. R&D) Cooperation Human capital

policy complementarity: effect on productivity and inequality technical Skills/Managerial skills Global engagement: trade/inward FDI/outward sourcing Competition/Regulation Much of policy framework in UK is right from economic perspective: emphasis on skills, tough competition, openness to trade and FDI, support for R&D Delivery. Need for rigorous evaluation (e.g. education reforms, R&D policy) 2 What NOT to do Large state-directed grand projet Aggressive attempts to repatriate R&D from US (Griffith, Harrision, Van Reenen, 2004) Create greater uncertainty through tinkering with small tax schemes. Evidence that investment responses retarded by micro-uncertainty

(on the increase in US and UK as macro-uncertainty has declined). Slows down reallocation which drives aggregate productivity Use R&D policy as a way of creating equality between regions of the country: need to concentrate resources where they can be best used (pick winners) 2 Conclusions UK continues to have a longstanding productivity gap with US (and France/Germany) Some improvement in recent years at closing the gap with EU and has kept up with US even in the miracle period post 1995 Policies to address the gap: We concentrates on R&D/innovation Skills

Managerial practices Competition Infrastructure Need for evaluation ..although long-term nature of evaluation must be recognised Not a single answer 2 Thank you For references and further reading Contact: [email protected] 2 Economics and Business Exchange Supported by Deloitte. 28

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • High-resolution assimilation and weather forecasting

    High-resolution assimilation and weather forecasting

    High-resolution assimilation and weather forecasting. Ross Bannister and Stefano Migliorini (NCEO, Reading) Mark Dixon (ex MetO, JCMM, Reading) NCEO Annual Conference, September 2010, Leicester
  • NAVFAC SMALL BUSINESS Topic: Jacksonville SAME Estimated time:

    NAVFAC SMALL BUSINESS Topic: Jacksonville SAME Estimated time:

    The NAVFAC Mission/Vision . MISSION: Why We Exist. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) is the Naval Shore and Expeditionary Systems Command that plans, builds, and maintains sustainable facilities, delivers environmental, utilities and other base services, and acquires and manages expeditionary...
  • Metodologia della Ricerca scelta del Disegno di Ricerca

    Metodologia della Ricerca scelta del Disegno di Ricerca

    (Parahoo, 2006) Sperimentazioni Questionari o Indagini Disegni Sperimentali I disegni sperimentali richiedono una robusta base teorica e scientifica ed un livello elevato delle variabili attraverso l'utilizzo di strumenti validi e affidabili Disegni Sperimentali: Tipologie Gli RCT ...
  • Sensory Science -

    Sensory Science -

    Sensory Science 101 Part I: Taste and Smell Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) What is Sensory Evaluation? "A scientific discipline used to evoke, measure, analyze and interpret those responses to products that are perceived by the senses of sight,...


    Rounding Decimals. Rounding Decimals. Look at the digit to the right of the place to which you are rounding. If it is . 5. or . greater, round . up. If it is . ... You can also use front-end...
  • Theoretical Issues in Psychology Philosophy of science and

    Theoretical Issues in Psychology Philosophy of science and

    B&LdeJ. Intentionality. Is a property of psychological phenomena of being about things; being directed to objects. It is the aboutness of mental states (such as, believing, desiring, hearing, mourning etc.).
  • Working group 2: Modeling and data assimilation Interim report

    Working group 2: Modeling and data assimilation Interim report

    NCEP Chemistry Modeling Overview and Status (With a focus on NEMS AQ development) Sarah Lu NOAA/NWS/NCEP Environmental Modeling Center with acknowledgments to many colleagues and collaborators
  • Unit 4 - Development through the Life Stages

    Unit 4 - Development through the Life Stages

    Learning Outcomes of Unit 4 . You will be able to: Identify and define the stages of growth and development through the human lifespan, Identify, define and apply the potential effects of life factors and events on the development of...